Wednesday, April 29, 2009

Neptune and back in 2 weeks

I just finished reading an interview with Paul A. Czysz professor emeritus of Aeronautical Engineering at St. Louis University. In the article, which is going to take me a while to verify, Czysz talks about Russian research into nuclear propulsion for spacecraft which by 2050 will allow for manned spaceflights to Pluto or Neptune with flight times measured in weeks instead of years.
By using some sort of MHD (magnetohydrodynamics) propulsion system with almost no “fuel” accelerating/decelerating at 1g a manned mission to Pluto could have a roundtrip time of slightly less than 1 month.
Professor Czysz also claims that Russian expertise in this field of research is 35 years ahead of American research. Then again Vladimir Putin claims Russian nanotechnology is a multi-billion dollar industry. I was able to find a soviet designed space plane based on the super-extra-top-secret Aurora space plane which uses what must be an early design of what Czysz mentions.
Importantly, the propulsion system relies on the Lorentz force like an ion engine does but does not shoot out ionized atoms. Instead it appears that the Russians are wrangling the alpha particle radiation of the reactor to provide thrust for the craft.
Thinking and visualizing this sort of system brings me back to military radar equipment, traditional UFO designs and the like. How do you direct alpha particles? Can you send them out from a flat or slightly curved surface? What does this mean as far as good old radiation poisoning goes? What “waste” particles would be best for propulsion?
In any event, this interview doubles my desire to learn more about MHD and nuclear physics.

NASA SELECTS MATERIAL FOR ORION SPACECRAFT HEAT SHIELD

NASA SELECTS MATERIAL FOR ORION SPACECRAFT HEAT SHIELD

HOUSTON -- NASA has chosen the material for a heat shield that will
protect a new generation of space explorers when they return from the
moon. After extensive study, NASA has selected the Avcoat ablator
system for the Orion crew module.

Orion is part of the Constellation Program that is developing the
country's next-generation spacecraft system for human exploration of
the moon and further destinations in the solar system. The Orion crew
module, which will launch atop an Ares I rocket, is targeted to begin
carrying astronauts to the International Space Station in 2015 and to
the moon in 2020.

Orion will face extreme conditions during its voyage to the moon and
on the journey home. On the blistering return through Earth's
atmosphere, the module will encounter temperatures as high as 5,000
degrees Fahrenheit. Heating rates may be up to five times more
extreme than rates for missions returning from the International
Space Station. Orion's heat shield, the dish-shaped thermal
protection system at the base of the spacecraft, will endure the most
heat and will erode, or "ablate," in a controlled fashion,
transporting heat away from the crew module during its descent
through the atmosphere.

To protect the spacecraft and its crew from such severe conditions,
the Orion Project Office at NASA's Johnson Space Center in Houston
identified a team to develop the thermal protection system, or TPS,
heat shield. For more than three years, NASA's Orion Thermal
Protection System Advanced Development Project considered eight
different candidate materials, including the two final candidates,
Avcoat and Phenolic Impregnated Carbon Ablator, or PICA, both of
which have proven successful in previous space missions.

Avcoat was used for the Apollo capsule heat shield and on select
regions of the space shuttle orbiter in its earliest flights. It was
put back into production for the study. It is made of silica fibers
with an epoxy-novalic resin filled in a fiberglass-phenolic honeycomb
and is manufactured directly onto the heat shield substructure and
attached as a unit to the crew module during spacecraft assembly.
PICA, which is manufactured in blocks and attached to the vehicle
after fabrication, was used on Stardust, NASA's first robotic space
mission dedicated solely to exploring a comet, and the first sample
return mission since Apollo.

"NASA made a significant technology development effort, conducted
thousands of tests, and tapped into the facilities, talents and
resources across the agency to understand how these materials would
perform on Orion's five-meter wide heat shield," said James Reuther,
the project manager of the study at NASA's Ames Research Center at
Moffett Field, Calif. "We manufactured full-scale demonstrations to
prove they could be efficiently and reliably produced for Orion."

Ames led the study in cooperation with experts from across the agency.
Engineers performed rigorous thermal, structural and environmental
testing on both candidate materials. The team then compared the
materials based on mass, thermal and structural performance, life
cycle costs, manufacturability, reliability and certification
challenges. NASA, working with Orion prime contractor Lockheed
Martin, recommended Avcoat as the more robust, reliable and mature
system.

"The biggest challenge with Avcoat has been reviving the technology to
manufacture the material such that its performance is similar to what
was demonstrated during the Apollo missions," said John Kowal,
Orion's thermal protection system manager at Johnson. "Once that had
been accomplished, the system evaluations clearly indicated that
Avcoat was the preferred system."

In partnership with the material subcontractor, Textron Defense
Systems of Wilmington, Mass., Lockheed Martin will continue
development of the material for Orion. While Avcoat was selected as
the better of the two candidates, more research is needed to
integrate it completely into Orion's design.

Thursday, April 23, 2009

Howdy Stranger

I just realized how long its been since I last put some thing on this site. I've been busy learning. In addition to the Shuttle engineering course I mentioned in the previous post I've also been watching Stanford CS 106A Programming Methodology and CS 223 Introduction to Robotics. Oh, and Solidworks, Dreamweaver and Microsoft Office tutorials. Today I'm going to be working on my computer upgrading to Vista and installing the other software that I've been studying. Which I'm guessing will take a few days just to get everything working properly again.

YouTube is becoming my University. In addtion to the college courses I've been watching TEDtalksdirector alot, its great mind expanding material.

Lately I've been thinking of a new smaller ship for earth orbiting, possibly moon trips. Fission rocket, using superheated water for propulsion. I have a cut-away drawing of a B-17 by my desk and visualize a modernized cockpit and nose section adapted for space flight.

Wednesday, February 25, 2009

Shuttle Systems course

I've been going through an online lecture series from the MIT opencourseware on Youtube recently learning the history and design of the Space Shuttle.


http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=35721A60B7B57386


Check it out if you're interested in the design of the shuttle or other spacecraft design considerations

Saturday, February 14, 2009

NASA Lunar Spacecraft Ships South In Preparation For Launch

Grey Hautaluoma
Headquarters, Washington
202-358-0668
grey.Hautaluoma-1@nasa.gov

Nancy Neal Jones
Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md.
301-286-0039
nancy.n.jones@nasa.gov


Feb. 11, 2009 RELEASE : 09-030 NASA Lunar Spacecraft Ships South In Preparation For Launch GREENBELT, Md. -- NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, or LRO, spacecraft was loaded on a truck Wednesday to begin its two-day journey to NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida. Launch is targeted for April 24.

The spacecraft was built by engineers at Goddard, where it recently completed two months of tests in a thermal vacuum chamber. During its time in the chamber, the spacecraft was subjected to hot and cold temperatures it will experience as it orbits the moon.

The satellite's mission is one of the first steps in NASA's plan to return astronauts to the moon. LRO will spend at least one year in a low polar orbit on its primary exploration mission, with the possibility of three more years to collect additional detailed scientific information about the moon and its environment.

The orbiter will carry seven instruments to provide scientists with detailed maps of the lunar surface and enhance our understanding of the moon's topography, lighting conditions, mineralogical composition and natural resources. Information gleaned from LRO will be used to select safe landing sites, determine locations for future lunar outposts and help mitigate radiation dangers to astronauts. The polar regions of the moon are the main focus of the mission because continuous access to sunlight may be possible and water ice may exist in permanently shadowed areas of the poles.

"This is the culmination of four years of hard work by everyone on the LRO Project," said Cathy Peddie, LRO deputy project manager at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md. "LRO now begins its launch site processing, where it will be prepped for integration with our sister mission LCROSS, and eventually encapsulated in the Atlas V for its journey to the moon."

LRO's instruments have considerable heritage from previous planetary science missions, enabling the spacecraft to transition to a research phase under the direction of NASA's Science Mission Directorate one year after launch.

Accompanying LRO on its journey to the moon will be the Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite, or LCROSS, a mission that will impact the lunar surface in its search for water ice. The LCROSS mission is managed by NASA's Ames Research Center at Moffett Field, Calif.

Goddard manages the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter for NASA's Exploration Systems Mission Directorate in Washington.

For more information about LRO, visit:


http://www.nasa.gov/lro

Soft-Gamma-Ray Repeater Observed by Swift and Fermi Telescopes

J.D. Harrington
Headquarters, Washington
202-358-5241
j.d.harrington@nasa.gov

Lynn Cominsky
Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park, Calif.
707-664-2655
lynnc@universe.sonoma.edu

Feb. 10, 2009 RELEASE : 09-028 NASA's Swift, Fermi Probe Fireworks From a Flaring Gamma-Ray Star WASHINGTON -- Astronomers using NASA's Swift satellite and Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope are seeing frequent blasts from a stellar remnant 30,000 light-years away. The high-energy fireworks arise from a rare type of neutron star known as a soft-gamma-ray repeater. Such objects unpredictably send out a series of X-ray and gamma-ray flares.

"At times, this remarkable object has erupted with more than a hundred flares in as little as 20 minutes," said Loredana Vetere, who is coordinating the Swift observations at Pennsylvania State University. "The most intense flares emitted more total energy than the sun does in 20 years."

The object, which has long been known as an X-ray source, lies in the southern constellation Norma. During the past two years, astronomers have identified pulsing radio and X-ray signals from it. The object began a series of modest eruptions on Oct. 3, 2008, then settled down. It roared back to life Jan. 22 with an intense episode.

Because of the recent outbursts, astronomers will classify the object as a soft-gamma-ray repeater -- only the sixth known. In 2004, a giant flare from another soft-gamma-ray repeater was so intense it measurably affected Earth's upper atmosphere from 50,000 light-years away.

Scientists think the source is a spinning neutron star, which is the superdense, city-sized remains of an exploded star. Although only about 12 miles across, a neutron star contains more mass than the sun. The object has been cataloged as SGR J1550-5418.

While neutron stars typically possess intense magnetic fields, a subgroup displays fields 1,000 times stronger. These so-called magnetars have the strongest magnetic fields of any known object in the universe. SGR J1550-5418, which rotates once every 2.07 seconds, holds the record for the fastest-spinning magnetar. Astronomers think magnetars power their flares by tapping into the tremendous energy of their magnetic fields.

"The ability of Fermi's gamma-ray burst monitor to resolve the fine structure within these events will help us better understand how magnetars unleash their energy," said Chryssa Kouveliotou, an astrophysicist at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Ala. The object has triggered the instrument more than 95 times since Jan. 22.

Using data from Swift's X-ray telescope, Jules Halpern at Columbia University captured the first "light echoes" ever seen from a soft-gamma-ray repeater. Images acquired when the latest flaring episode began show what appear to be expanding halos around the source. Multiple rings form as X-rays interact with dust clouds at different distances, with closer clouds producing larger rings. Both the rings and their apparent expansion are an illusion caused by the finite speed of light and the longer path the scattered light must travel.

"X-rays from the brightest bursts scatter off of dust clouds between us and the star," Halpern said. "As a result, we don't really know the distance to this object as well as we would like. These images will help us make a more precise measurement and also determine the distance to the dust clouds."

NASA's Wind satellite, the joint NASA-Japan Suzaku mission, and the European Space Agency's INTEGRAL satellite also have detected flares from SGR J1550-5418.

NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md., manages the Swift satellite. It is being operated in collaboration with partners in the U.S., the United Kingdom, Italy, Germany and Japan. NASA's Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope is an astrophysics and particle physics observatory developed in collaboration with the U.S. Department of Energy and with important contributions from academic institutions and partners in France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Sweden, and the U.S.

To see the related images, visit:


http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/swift/bursts/gammaray_fireworks.html


For more information about the Swift satellite, visit:




http://www.nasa.gov/swift


For more information about the Fermi mission, visit;


http://www.nasa.gov/fermi



- end -

Wednesday, February 4, 2009

Video Examples of Experimental Fusion Reactors

These are both "very simple" reactors. While fusion occurs in both set-ups neither is capable of producing energy.